Re: reduce memory allocation in the btrfs direct I/O path

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 08:46:50PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> On Sat, May 07, 2022 at 07:26:49AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 10:18:03AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > > The series is reasonably short so I'd like to add it to 5.20 queue,
>                                                               ^^^^
> Sorry, I meant 5.19, ie. the one that's about to start soon.
> 
> > > > provided that the iomap patches get acked by Darrick. Any fixups I'd
> > > > rather fold into my local branch, no need to resend unless there are
> > > > significant updates.
> > > 
> > > Hm.  I'm planning on pushing out a (very late) iomap-5.19-merge branch,
> > > since (AFAICT) these changes are mostly plumbing.  Do you want me to
> > > push the first three patches of this series for 5.19?
> > 
> > Given that we have no conflicts it might be easiest to just merge the
> > whole series through the btrfs tree.
> 
> Yeah, I'd rather take it via the btrfs tree.

Ah, *5.19*.  Yes, this plan now sounds good to me!

(I had wondered, 5.20 seemed like an awfully long time to wait for
something as straightforward as that.)

--D



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux