On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 11:05:47AM +0800, Xin Yin wrote: > On Sat, May 7, 2022 at 9:08 PM JeffleXu <jefflexu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > On 5/7/22 4:31 PM, Xin Yin wrote: > > > Use asyncronous io to read data from fscache may greatly improve IO > > > bandwidth for sequential buffer read scenario. > > > > > > Change erofs_fscache_read_folios to erofs_fscache_read_folios_async, > > > and read data from fscache asyncronously. Make .readpage()/.readahead() > > > to use this new helper. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Xin Yin <yinxin.x@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > > s/asyncronous/asynchronous/ > > s/asyncronously/asynchronously/ > > > Thanks for pointing this out , I will fix it. > > > BTW, "convert to asynchronous readahead" may be more concise? > > > You mean the title of this patch? But, actually we also change to use > this asynchronous io helper for .readpage() now , so I think we need > to point this in the title. right ? No worries, I pushed this for 0day ci yesterday, Jeffle may send out another v11 with this patch included if needed. Thanks, Gao Xiang > > Thanks, > Xin Yin > > Apart from that, LGTM > > > > Reviewed-by: Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > -- > > Thanks, > > Jeffle