On 2022-05-03 22:05, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Applied to f2fs tree. Thanks,
>
Thanks Jaegeuk. I will remove the f2fs patches from my next revision
Regards,
Pankaj
> On 04/27, Pankaj Raghav wrote:
>> From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> F2FS zoned support has power of 2 zone size assumption in many places
>> such as in __f2fs_issue_discard_zone, init_blkz_info. As the power of 2
>> requirement has been removed from the block layer, explicitly add a
>> condition in f2fs to allow only power of 2 zone size devices.
>>
>> This condition will be relaxed once those calculation based on power of
>> 2 is made generic.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> fs/f2fs/super.c | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
>> index f64761a15df7..db79abf30002 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
>> @@ -3685,6 +3685,10 @@ static int init_blkz_info(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int devi)
>> return 0;
>>
>> zone_sectors = bdev_zone_sectors(bdev);
>> + if (!is_power_of_2(zone_sectors)) {
>> + f2fs_err(sbi, "F2FS does not support non power of 2 zone sizes\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>>
>> if (sbi->blocks_per_blkz && sbi->blocks_per_blkz !=
>> SECTOR_TO_BLOCK(zone_sectors))
>> --
>> 2.25.1
