On 4/29/22 4:18 AM, Hao Xu wrote:
> @@ -1030,6 +1101,7 @@ static bool io_wq_work_match_item(struct io_wq_work *work, void *data)
> static void io_wqe_enqueue(struct io_wqe *wqe, struct io_wq_work *work)
> {
> struct io_wqe_acct *acct = io_work_get_acct(wqe, work);
> + struct io_wqe_acct *fixed_acct;
> struct io_cb_cancel_data match;
> unsigned work_flags = work->flags;
> bool do_create;
> @@ -1044,8 +1116,14 @@ static void io_wqe_enqueue(struct io_wqe *wqe, struct io_wq_work *work)
> return;
> }
>
> + fixed_acct = io_get_acct(wqe, !acct->index, true);
> + if (fixed_acct->fixed_worker_registered && !io_wq_is_hashed(work)) {
> + if (io_wqe_insert_private_work(wqe, work, fixed_acct))
> + return;
> + }
> +
As per previous email, I was going to comment back saying "why don't we
just always do hashed work on the non-fixed workers?" - but that's
already what you are doing. Isn't this fine, does anything else need to
get done here in terms of hashed work and fixed workers? If you need
per-iowq serialization, then you don't get a fixed worker.
--
Jens Axboe
