[patch 11/14] fs: dcache reduce dput locking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



It is possible to run dput without taking locks up-front. In many cases
where we don't kill the dentry anyway, these locks are not required.

(I think... need to think about it more). Further changes ->d_delete
locking which is not all audited.

---
 fs/dcache.c |   56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/fs/dcache.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/dcache.c
+++ linux-2.6/fs/dcache.c
@@ -262,6 +262,7 @@ static struct dentry *d_kill(struct dent
 void dput(struct dentry *dentry)
 {
 	struct dentry *parent;
+
 	if (!dentry)
 		return;
 
@@ -269,23 +270,8 @@ repeat:
 	if (dentry->d_count == 1)
 		might_sleep();
 	spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
-	if (dentry->d_count == 1) {
-		if (!spin_trylock(&dcache_inode_lock)) {
-drop2:
-			spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
-			goto repeat;
-		}
-		parent = dentry->d_parent;
-		if (parent) {
-			BUG_ON(parent == dentry);
-			if (!spin_trylock(&parent->d_lock)) {
-				spin_unlock(&dcache_inode_lock);
-				goto drop2;
-			}
-		}
-	}
-	dentry->d_count--;
-	if (dentry->d_count) {
+	if (dentry->d_count > 1) {
+		dentry->d_count--;
 		spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
 		return;
 	}
@@ -294,8 +280,10 @@ drop2:
 	 * AV: ->d_delete() is _NOT_ allowed to block now.
 	 */
 	if (dentry->d_op && dentry->d_op->d_delete) {
-		if (dentry->d_op->d_delete(dentry))
-			goto unhash_it;
+		if (dentry->d_op->d_delete(dentry)) {
+			__d_drop(dentry);
+			goto kill_it;
+		}
 	}
 	/* Unreachable? Get rid of it */
  	if (d_unhashed(dentry))
@@ -304,15 +292,31 @@ drop2:
   		dentry->d_flags |= DCACHE_REFERENCED;
 		dentry_lru_add(dentry);
   	}
- 	spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
-	if (parent)
-		spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
-	spin_unlock(&dcache_inode_lock);
-	return;
+	dentry->d_count--;
+	spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
+  	return;
 
-unhash_it:
-	__d_drop(dentry);
 kill_it:
+	spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
+	spin_lock(&dcache_inode_lock);
+relock:
+	spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
+	parent = dentry->d_parent;
+	if (parent) {
+		BUG_ON(parent == dentry);
+		if (!spin_trylock(&parent->d_lock)) {
+			spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
+			goto relock;
+		}
+	}
+	dentry->d_count--;
+	if (dentry->d_count) {
+		spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
+		spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
+		spin_unlock(&dcache_inode_lock);
+		printk("elevated d_count\n");
+		return;
+	}
 	/* if dentry was on the d_lru list delete it from there */
 	dentry_lru_del(dentry);
 	dentry = d_kill(dentry);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux