Re: [PATCH RFC v22 1/7] NFSD: add courteous server support for thread with only delegation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 4/27/22 8:44 PM, dai.ngo@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:

On 4/27/22 6:52 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 03:52:37PM -0700, dai.ngo@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 4/27/22 2:56 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 01:52:47AM -0700, Dai Ngo wrote:
This patch provides courteous server support for delegation only.
Only expired client with delegation but no conflict and no open
or lock state is allowed to be in COURTESY state.

Delegation conflict with COURTESY/EXPIRABLE client is resolved by
setting it to EXPIRABLE, queue work for the laundromat and return
delay to the caller. Conflict is resolved when the laudromat runs
and expires the EXIRABLE client while the NFS client retries the
OPEN request. Local thread request that gets conflict is doing the
retry in _break_lease.

Client in COURTESY or EXPIRABLE state is allowed to reconnect and
continues to have access to its state. Access to the nfs4_client by
the reconnecting thread and the laundromat is serialized via the
client_lock.

Signed-off-by: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
  fs/nfsd/nfsd.h      |  1 +
  fs/nfsd/state.h     | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++
  3 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index 234e852fcdfa..216bd77a8764 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -125,6 +125,8 @@ static void free_session(struct nfsd4_session *);
  static const struct nfsd4_callback_ops nfsd4_cb_recall_ops;
  static const struct nfsd4_callback_ops nfsd4_cb_notify_lock_ops;
+static struct workqueue_struct *laundry_wq;
+
  static bool is_session_dead(struct nfsd4_session *ses)
  {
      return ses->se_flags & NFS4_SESSION_DEAD;
@@ -152,6 +154,7 @@ static __be32 get_client_locked(struct nfs4_client *clp)
      if (is_client_expired(clp))
          return nfserr_expired;
      atomic_inc(&clp->cl_rpc_users);
+    clp->cl_state = NFSD4_ACTIVE;
      return nfs_ok;
  }
@@ -172,6 +175,7 @@ renew_client_locked(struct nfs4_client *clp)
      list_move_tail(&clp->cl_lru, &nn->client_lru);
      clp->cl_time = ktime_get_boottime_seconds();
+    clp->cl_state = NFSD4_ACTIVE;
  }
  static void put_client_renew_locked(struct nfs4_client *clp)
@@ -2004,6 +2008,7 @@ static struct nfs4_client *alloc_client(struct xdr_netobj name)
      idr_init(&clp->cl_stateids);
      atomic_set(&clp->cl_rpc_users, 0);
      clp->cl_cb_state = NFSD4_CB_UNKNOWN;
+    clp->cl_state = NFSD4_ACTIVE;
      INIT_LIST_HEAD(&clp->cl_idhash);
      INIT_LIST_HEAD(&clp->cl_openowners);
      INIT_LIST_HEAD(&clp->cl_delegations);
@@ -4694,9 +4699,16 @@ nfsd_break_deleg_cb(struct file_lock *fl)
      bool ret = false;
      struct nfs4_delegation *dp = (struct nfs4_delegation *)fl->fl_owner;
      struct nfs4_file *fp = dp->dl_stid.sc_file;
+    struct nfs4_client *clp = dp->dl_stid.sc_client;
+    struct nfsd_net *nn;
      trace_nfsd_cb_recall(&dp->dl_stid);
+    if (!try_to_expire_client(clp)) {
+        nn = net_generic(clp->net, nfsd_net_id);
+        mod_delayed_work(laundry_wq, &nn->laundromat_work, 0);
+    }
+
      /*
       * We don't want the locks code to timeout the lease for us;
       * we'll remove it ourself if a delegation isn't returned
@@ -5605,6 +5617,65 @@ static void nfsd4_ssc_expire_umount(struct nfsd_net *nn)
  }
  #endif
+/*
+ * place holder for now, no check for lock blockers yet
+ */
+static bool
+nfs4_anylock_blockers(struct nfs4_client *clp)
+{
+    /*
+     * don't want to check for delegation conflict here since
+     * we need the state_lock for it. The laundromat willexpire
+     * COURTESY later when checking for delegation recall timeout.
+     */
+    return false;
+}
+
+static bool client_has_state_tmp(struct nfs4_client *clp)
+{
+    if (!list_empty(&clp->cl_delegations) &&
+            !client_has_openowners(clp) &&
+            list_empty(&clp->async_copies))
+        return true;
+    return false;
+}
+
+static void
+nfs4_get_client_reaplist(struct nfsd_net *nn, struct list_head *reaplist,
+                struct laundry_time *lt)
+{
+    struct list_head *pos, *next;
+    struct nfs4_client *clp;
+    bool cour;
+
+    INIT_LIST_HEAD(reaplist);
+    spin_lock(&nn->client_lock);
+    list_for_each_safe(pos, next, &nn->client_lru) {
+        clp = list_entry(pos, struct nfs4_client, cl_lru);
+        if (clp->cl_state == NFSD4_EXPIRABLE)
+            goto exp_client;
+        if (!state_expired(lt, clp->cl_time))
+            break;
+        if (!client_has_state_tmp(clp))
+            goto exp_client;
+        cour = (clp->cl_state == NFSD4_COURTESY);
+        if (cour && ktime_get_boottime_seconds() >=
+                (clp->cl_time + NFSD_COURTESY_CLIENT_TIMEOUT)) {
+            goto exp_client;
+        }
+        if (nfs4_anylock_blockers(clp)) {
+exp_client:
+            if (mark_client_expired_locked(clp))
+                continue;
+            list_add(&clp->cl_lru, reaplist);
+            continue;
+        }
+        if (!cour)
+            cmpxchg(&clp->cl_state, NFSD4_ACTIVE, NFSD4_COURTESY);
I just noticed there's a small race here: a lock conflict (for example)
could intervene between checking nfs4_anylock_blockers and setting
COURTESY.
If there is lock conflict intervenes before setting COURTESY then that
lock request is denied since the client is ACTIVE. Does NFSv4, NLM
client retry the lock request? if it does then on next retry the
COURTESY client will be expired.
I'm thinking of a local request for a blocking lock.  Yes, the request
will be denied, but then the process will block on the lock forever
(well, for 24 hours anyway).

Actually if the local request is blocked, it will be blocked for max of
a lease period. When the laundromat runs again, it will detect there is
blockers and expire the COURTESY client.

I will move the setting of COURTESY to earlier as you suggested since
it also makes the code more compact.

-Dai




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux