Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] userfaultfd: add /dev/userfaultfd for fine grained access control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Axel,

On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 02:29:41PM -0700, Axel Rasmussen wrote:
> @@ -65,6 +66,8 @@ struct userfaultfd_ctx {
>  	unsigned int flags;
>  	/* features requested from the userspace */
>  	unsigned int features;
> +	/* whether or not to handle kernel faults */
> +	bool handle_kernel_faults;

Could you help explain why we need this bool?  I failed to figure out
myself on the difference against "!(ctx->flags & UFFD_USER_MODE_ONLY)".

Thanks,

-- 
Peter Xu




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux