on 2022/4/19 22:02, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 07:47:11PM +0800, Yang Xu wrote:
>> Like other use ${fs}_init_acl and posix_acl_create filesystem, we don't
>> need to assign NULL for acl and default_acl pointer because f2fs_acl_create
>> will do this job. So remove it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Xu<xuyang2018.jy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> fs/f2fs/acl.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/acl.c b/fs/f2fs/acl.c
>> index eaa240b21f07..9ae2d2fec58b 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/acl.c
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/acl.c
>> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ static int f2fs_acl_create(struct inode *dir, umode_t *mode,
>> int f2fs_init_acl(struct inode *inode, struct inode *dir, struct page *ipage,
>> struct page *dpage)
>> {
>> - struct posix_acl *default_acl = NULL, *acl = NULL;
>> + struct posix_acl *default_acl, *acl;
>
> Hm, patches like this have nothing to do with the theme of this patch
> series. They can go as completely independent patches to the relevant
> fses. Imho, they don't belong with this series at all.
Ok.
