Re: [PATCH][BUG] Lack of mutex_lock in drop_pagecache_sb()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi, Fengguang

On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:38:46 +0800
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Masasyoshi, 
> 
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 05:13:35PM +0900, Masasyoshi MIZUMA wrote:
> > I create the patch which fixes lack of mutex_lock in drop_pagecache_sb().
> > Please check the bug and the patch (below).
> 
Thank you for your comment, and I apologize to you for my lack
of explanation.

> Is this a real producible bug or a theory one?
This is a real bug.

> IMHO the I_FREEING flag should avoid the race.
I supplement the explanation for this problem.

clear_inode() is called by dispose_list(), and sets the inode's 
i_state to I_CLEAR. Therefore, the following conditional expression 
doesn't match for the inode:
"if (inode->i_state & (I_FREEING|I_WILL_FREE)) continue;"
As the result, this problem can happen.

> 
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > When drop_pagecache_sb() frees inodes, it doesn't get mutex_lock of 
> > iprune_mutex. Therefore, if it races the process which frees inodes 
> > (ex. prune_icache()), OS panic may happen.
> > 
> > An example of the panic flow is the following:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >             [process A]               |         [process B]
> >  |                                    |
> >  |  shrink_icache_memory()            |
> >  |      |                             |
> >  |      V                             |
> >  |    prune_icache()                  |  drop_pagecache()
> >  |      mutex_lock(&iprune_mutex)     |      |
> >  |      spin_lock(&inode_lock)        |      |
> >  |          |                         |      V
> >  |          |                         |    drop_pagecache_sb()
> >  |          |                         |        |
> 
>           inode->i_state |= I_FREEING;
> 
> >  |          V                         |        V
> >  |      spin_unlock(&inode_lock)      |      spin_lock(&inode_lock)
> >  |          |                         |          |
> 
>                                                 if (inode->i_state & (I_FREEING|I_WILL_FREE))
>                                                         continue;
> 
> >  |          |                         |          |
> >  |          V                         |          V
> >  |      dispose_list()                |        __iget()
> >  |        list_del()                  |            |
> >  |            |                       |            |
> >  |            V                       |            V
> >  |        spin_lock(&inode_lock)      |          list_move() <----- PANIC !!
> >  |                                    |
> >  V                                    |
> > (time)
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > If the inode which Process B do list_move() with is the same as the one which
> > Process A did list_del() with, OS may panic.

I applied your comment and then modified the panic flow figure.
Please check below:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
            [process A]               |        [process B]
 |                                    |
 |  shrink_icache_memory()            |
 |      |                             |
 |      V                             |
 |    prune_icache()                  | drop_pagecache()
 |      mutex_lock(&iprune_mutex)     |     |
 |      spin_lock(&inode_lock)        |     |
 |          |                         |     V
 |          |                         |   drop_pagecache_sb()
 |          |                         |       |
 |          V                         |       |
 |      inode->i_state |= I_FREEING;  |       |
 |          |                         |       |
 |          V                         |       V
 |      spin_unlock(&inode_lock)      |     spin_lock(&inode_lock)
 |          |                         |         |
 |          |                         |         |
 |          V                         |         |
 |      dispose_list()                |         |
 |        list_del()                  |         |
 |            |                       |         |
 |            V                       |         |
 |        clear_inode()               |         |
 |          inode->i_state = I_CLEAR  |         |
 |            |                       |         |
 |            |                       |         V
 |            |                       |      if (inode->i_state & (I_FREEING|I_WILL_FREE))
 |            |                       |              continue;           <---- NOT MATCH
 |            |                       |           |
 |            |                       |           V
 |            |                       |      __iget()   
 |            |                       |            |
 |            V                       |            V
 |        spin_lock(&inode_lock)      |        list_move() <----- PANIC !!
 |                                    |
 V                                    |
(time)
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks,
Masayoshi MIZUMA


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux