On 2022/04/16 13:38, Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thx for the report. Maybe a bisection is what's needed here, but lets > see what David says, maybe he has a idea already. I wish I could do that, but it's very hard to reproduce; the first reports came after a week or so. That way, a bisect would take months. So yes, wait for David, because he might give a clue how to trigger the problem more quickly to make a bisect practical.