Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] fs/namei.c: Add missing umask strip in vfs_tmpfile

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 07:02:18PM +0800, Yang Xu wrote:
> If underflying filesystem doesn't enable own CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL, then
> posix_acl_create can't be called. So we will miss umask strip, ie
> use ext4 with noacl or disblae CONFIG_EXT4_FS_POSIX_ACL.

Hm, maybe:

"All creation paths except for O_TMPFILE handle umask in the vfs
directly if the filesystem doesn't support or enable POSIX ACLs. If the
filesystem does then umask handling is deferred until
posix_acl_create().
Because, O_TMPFILE misses umask handling in the vfs it will not honor
umask settings. Fix this by adding the missing umask handling."

> 
> Reported-by: Christian Brauner (Microsoft) <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Acked-by: Christian Brauner (Microsoft) <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>

>  fs/namei.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
> index 3f1829b3ab5b..bbc7c950bbdc 100644
> --- a/fs/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/namei.c
> @@ -3521,6 +3521,8 @@ struct dentry *vfs_tmpfile(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns,
>  	child = d_alloc(dentry, &slash_name);
>  	if (unlikely(!child))
>  		goto out_err;
> +	if (!IS_POSIXACL(dir))
> +		mode &= ~current_umask();
>  	error = dir->i_op->tmpfile(mnt_userns, dir, child, mode);
>  	if (error)
>  		goto out_err;
> -- 
> 2.27.0
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux