unprivileged mounts vs. rmdir (was: VFS, NFS security bug? ...)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



[CCs trimmed]

On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting J. Bruce Fields (bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx):
> > special privilege, so don't consult filesystem permissions (do I have
> > that right?  What happened to the attempt to allow ordinary users to
> > mount?).
> 
> Well, they keep getting stalled because we don't have a good answer for
> what to do about the fact that an unprivileged user can make trees
> undeletable by pinning them with mounts.  (Miklos and Eric cc'd in case
> I didn't explain that well enough).

That's correct.

The best answer I can come up with is to allow rmdir/unlink to
automatically umount trees from their respective dentries.  Obviously
this can't be done for regular (privileged) mounts, which must keep
returning EBUSY in such situations.

But for unprivileged mounts I can't see any fundamental issue with
such an approach.

Does anyone see a problem with this?  Is there a better solution?

Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux