Re: [RFC Aufs2 #3 2/2] split 'xino' entry under sysfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 02:15:49PM +0900, hooanon05@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> Greg KH:
> > Looks like a good start, if you are _sure_ you need sysfs files :)
> 
> I believe those paths are important to users.
> When CONFIG_SYSFS is disabled, they are printed in /proc/mounts (and has
> severer limit).

No one disables sysfs that I know of.  Heck, my phone enables sysfs...

> Addition to set limit, there is one more reason to adopt seq_file.
> Because the printed string is a path, it may contain unprintable
> characters. seq_file has a good interface seq_path() which supports
> escaping such characters.

That is true.  Ok, let's see the final result and I'll be glad to look
at it.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux