Re: [RFC 0/3] softirq: Introduce softirq throttling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Liao Chang <liaochang1@xxxxxxxxxx>, mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx, keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx, yzaikin@xxxxxxxxxx, liaochang1@xxxxxxxxxx, clg@xxxxxxxx, nitesh@xxxxxxxxxx, edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx, peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, joshdon@xxxxxxxxxx, masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx, nathan@xxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, vbabka@xxxxxxx, gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx, arnd@xxxxxxxx, chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx, linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, john.ogness@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, will@xxxxxxxxxx, dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx, frederic@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] softirq: Introduce softirq throttling
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2022 12:57:15 +0200
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, heying24@xxxxxxxxxx, guohanjun@xxxxxxxxxx, weiyongjun1@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20220406025241.191300-1-liaochang1@huawei.com>

On Wed, Apr 06 2022 at 10:52, Liao Chang wrote:

Why are you sending this twice within a few hours? See
Documentation/process/

Thanks,

        tglx

References:
- [RFC 0/3] softirq: Introduce softirq throttling
  - From: Liao Chang

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] FUSE: Implement atomic lookup + open
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] btrfs: Avoid live-lock in search_ioctl() on hardware with sub-page faults
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC 0/3] softirq: Introduce softirq throttling
Next by thread: [RFC 0/3] softirq: Introduce softirq throttling
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [NTFS 3] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [NTFS 3] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux