On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 10:48:06AM +0800, tangmeng wrote: > > > On 2022/2/27 05:02, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > > > > > Thanks but please send a v3 including all the other patches as well > > and collecting the Reviewed/Acked-bys, etc. This can be sent *after* > > your v3 of the optimization work. > > > I have noticed that there is a conflict between sysctl-next and linux-next. > Do I resubmit the patch based on linux-next, or after you deal with the > conflict between sysctl-next and linux-next, I resubmit based on > sysctl-next？ You can use sysctl-next now to base your development changes. Feel free to send more changes. Luis
