Evgeniy Polyakov: > On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 01:05:47PM +0900, hooanon05@xxxxxxxxxxx (hooanon05@xxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > Is the limit of PATH_MAX applied to the absolute path too? > > No, only path used in the given operation (related or absolute) is > limited. If related path is converted into the absolute just for the > purpose of dump and not to be used in some syscall, it can have any > length, so you may need to rethink which pathes are presented in sysfs > and what should be moved outside. As a result, current code is implemented. - aufs entries under sysfs print the absolute path. - sets limit (PAGE_SIZE) to its length. - and I think it is enough. Theoretically, every entries under procfs (or sysfs?) which contains the absolute path have this problem. J. R. Okajima -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
