Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] Better handling of negative dentries

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 01:56:18PM -0700, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> I’d be happy to join this discussion. And in my opinion it’s going
> beyond negative dentries: there are other types of objects which tend
> to grow beyond any reasonable limits if there is no memory pressure.
>
> A perfect example when it happens is when a machine is almost idle
> for some period of time. Periodically running processes creating
> various kernel objects (mostly vfs cache) which over time are filling
> significant portions of the total memory. And when the need for memory
> arises, we realize that the memory is heavily fragmented and it’s
> costly to reclaim it back.

When you say "vfs cache", do you mean page cache, inode cache, or
something else?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux