On Thu, 2022-03-17 at 14:26 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > This looks great; thank you for the tweak. :) > > Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Shall I take this separately into the for-next/execve tree, or would > you > rather is stay in this series? > > -Kees Great thanks. Yea that would probably be the best I think, unless anyone speaks up.
