Re: [PATCH v1] fs: Fix inconsistent f_mode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2022/03/12 7:15, Paul Moore wrote:
> The silence on this has been deafening :/  No thoughts on fixing, or
> not fixing OPEN_FMODE(), Al?

On 2022/03/01 19:15, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> 
> On 01/03/2022 10:22, Christian Brauner wrote:
>> That specific part seems a bit risky at first glance. Given that the
>> patch referenced is from 2009 this means we've been allowing O_WRONLY |
>> O_RDWR to succeed for almost 13 years now.
>
> Yeah, it's an old bug, but we should keep in mind that a file descriptor
> created with such flags cannot be used to read nor write. However,
> unfortunately, it can be used for things like ioctl, fstat, chdir… I
> don't know if there is any user of this trick.

I got a reply from Al at https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20090212032821.GD28946@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
that sys_open(path, 3) is for ioctls only. And I'm using this trick when opening something
for ioctls only.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux