This series is a follow-up to the series below. The old series added an assertion to btrfs_relocate_chunk() to check if it is protected with sb_start_write(). However, it revealed another location we need to add sb_start_write() [1]. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/cover.1645157220.git.naohiro.aota@xxxxxxx/T/ [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/cover.1645157220.git.naohiro.aota@xxxxxxx/T/#e06eecc07ce1cd1e45bfd30a374bd2d15b4fd76d8 Patches 1 and 2 add sb_{start,end}_write() to the resumed async balancing and device addition. Patches 3 and 4 add an ASSERT to catch a future error. Note: I added Fixes tag as "5accdf82ba25 ("fs: Improve filesystem freezing handling")" considering that sb_start_write() is missing from the introduction of it. But, I'm not sure this commit is correct or not. Naohiro Aota (4): btrfs: mark resumed async balance as writing btrfs: mark device addition as sb_writing fs: add check functions for sb_start_{write,pagefault,intwrite} btrfs: assert that relocation is protected with sb_start_write() fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 2 ++ fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 5 +++++ include/linux/fs.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+) -- 2.35.1
