Re: [LSF/MM/BPF BoF] BoF for Zoned Storage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 6:51 AM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Thinking proactively about LSFMM, regarding just Zone storage..
>
> I'd like to propose a BoF for Zoned Storage. The point of it is
> to address the existing point points we have and take advantage of
> having folks in the room we can likely settle on things faster which
> otherwise would take years.
>
> I'll throw at least one topic out:
>
>   * Raw access for zone append for microbenchmarks:
>         - are we really happy with the status quo?
>         - if not what outlets do we have?

Many choices were discussed/implemented in my last attempt to do
append via io_uring/aio.
Without consensus though. Perhaps F2F can help reaching it. I'd like
to join this discussion.

> I think the nvme passthrogh stuff deserves it's own shared
> discussion though and should not make it part of the BoF.

Yes indeed, there is more to it.
We may anyway have to forgo append (and other-commands requiring extra
result) in the first drop of uring-passthru at least. For good
reasons. But let's discuss that in a separate thread along with some
code.

Thanks,
-- 
Kanchan



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux