Re: [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] configfd as a replacement for both ioctls and fsconfig

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 12:14:49PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> It looks fairly similar given the iouring syscalls are on an fd except
> that the structure above hash to be defined and becomes an ABI.  Since
> they configfd uses typed key value pairs, i'd argue it's more generic
> and introspectable.

I'm not suggesting using io-uring cmd as a configuration alternative
to configfd, I'm suggesting it can be an async *vehicle* for a bunch
of configurations one might need to make in the kernel. If we want
to reduce system call uses, we may want to allow something like configfd
to accept a batch of configuration options as well, as a batcha, and a
final commit to process them.

  Luis



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux