Re: regression: Bug 215601 - gcc segv at startup on ia64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> When the kernel tries to map these with a combined allocation, it asks
> for a giant mmap of the file, but the file is, of course, not at all
> that large, and the mapping is rejected.

> So... I'm trying to think about how best to deal with this. If I or
> anyone else can't think of an elegant solution, I'll send a revert for
> the offending patch next week.

Shouldn't we just be able to patch total_mapping_size() again to instead
sum up all p_memsz fields, instead of comparing minimum and maximum
p_vaddr?

Runtime complexity would be the same as we are iterating through all
segments already anyway. And I would also argue that is the behaviour
that one wanted to see in that function anyway.

If you agree with this, I can post a patch, but I would need to know
what tree to base it on to avoid merge conflicts with the just merged
patch from Alexey.

--
Magnus



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux