Re: lockdep warning with 2.6.29-rc6-mm1 (mmotm 24-feb-2009)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 18:27 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> > I see the following on my machine. My understanding is that the
> > lockdep warning is complaining about a potential deadlock while
> > reclaiming, where we could end up waiting on holding inotify_mutex,
> > and we could end up calling reclaim with inotify_mutex held.
> > 
> > The race seems rare, since one path shows a new inode being created
> > and the other one being deleted. It seems like a false positive unless
> > the inode's in question turn out to be potentially the same.
> 
> Its not a false positive until you can guarantee the inodes will _never_
> be the same.
> 
> This thing has been reported numerous times, Ingo even posted 
> a potential fix for it, Nick poked the inotify people to speak 
> up, but they have so far been silent on the issue :-(

that particular fix is upstream, via:

  3023a3e: inotify: fix GFP_KERNEL related deadlock

so does this reproduce with latest .29-rc7-ish kernels too - or 
do we have some other problem in this area too?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux