Re: [fuse-devel] delta filesystem prototype

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 01 Mar 2009, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Obviously with delta storage the underlying branches really MUST be
> read-only. As for configuration I see no problem in clasifying a
> branch as RO, RW or D. If the user wants a modifiable RO branch then
> he can not have any D branch. Easy enough.

Not necessarily.  A delta filesystem could support automatic or manual
merges very well.  This is not really possible with a writable union.

Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux