Re: [PATCH] bpf: move the bpf syscall sysctl table to its own module

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 5:35 PM Yan Zhu <zhuyan34@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Sysctl table is easier to read under its own module.

"own module"?
What are you talking about?
It's not "easier to read" and looks like a pointless churn.

> Signed-off-by: Yan Zhu <zhuyan34@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  kernel/sysctl.c      | 71 ----------------------------------------------
>  2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux