Re: [PATCH v1 07/14] fs: Add aop_flags parameter to create_page_buffers()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 10:30:33AM -0800, Stefan Roesch wrote:
> On 2/14/22 10:14 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 09:43:56AM -0800, Stefan Roesch wrote:
> >> This adds the aop_flags parameter to the create_page_buffers function.
> >> When AOP_FLAGS_NOWAIT parameter is set, the atomic allocation flag is
> >> set. The AOP_FLAGS_NOWAIT flag is set, when async buffered writes are
> >> enabled.
> > 
> > Why is this better than passing in gfp flags directly?
> > 
> 
> I don't think that gfp flags are a great fit here. We only want to pass in
> a nowait flag and this does not map nicely to a gfp flag. 

... what?  The only thing you do with this flag is use it to choose
some gfp flags.  Pass those gfp flags in directly.

> >> +		gfp_t gfp = GFP_NOFS | __GFP_ACCOUNT;
> >> +
> >> +		if (aop_flags & AOP_FLAGS_NOWAIT) {
> >> +			gfp |= GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN;
> >> +			gfp &= ~__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM;
> >> +		} else {
> >> +			gfp |= __GFP_NOFAIL;
> >> +		}

The flags you've chosen here are also bonkers, but I'm not sure that
it's worth explaining to you why if you're this resistant to making
obvious corrections to your patches.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux