Re: [PATCH v10 7/9] mm: Introduce mf_dax_kill_procs() for fsdax case

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 4:41 AM Shiyang Ruan <ruansy.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This function is called at the end of RMAP routine, i.e. filesystem
> recovery function, to collect and kill processes using a shared page of
> DAX file.  The difference with mf_generic_kill_procs() is, it accepts
> file's (mapping,offset) instead of struct page because different files'
> mappings and offsets may share the same page in fsdax mode.
> It will be called when filesystem's RMAP results are found.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shiyang Ruan <ruansy.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  include/linux/mm.h  |  4 ++
>  mm/memory-failure.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  2 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 9b1d56c5c224..0420189e4788 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -3195,6 +3195,10 @@ enum mf_flags {
>         MF_SOFT_OFFLINE = 1 << 3,
>         MF_UNPOISON = 1 << 4,
>  };
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FS_DAX)
> +int mf_dax_kill_procs(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t index,
> +                     unsigned long count, int mf_flags);
> +#endif /* CONFIG_FS_DAX */
>  extern int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags);
>  extern void memory_failure_queue(unsigned long pfn, int flags);
>  extern void memory_failure_queue_kick(int cpu);
> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index b2d13eba1071..8d123cc4102e 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -304,10 +304,9 @@ void shake_page(struct page *p)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(shake_page);
>
> -static unsigned long dev_pagemap_mapping_shift(struct page *page,
> -               struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +static unsigned long dev_pagemap_mapping_shift(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> +               unsigned long address)
>  {
> -       unsigned long address = vma_address(page, vma);
>         unsigned long ret = 0;
>         pgd_t *pgd;
>         p4d_t *p4d;
> @@ -347,9 +346,8 @@ static unsigned long dev_pagemap_mapping_shift(struct page *page,
>   * Schedule a process for later kill.
>   * Uses GFP_ATOMIC allocations to avoid potential recursions in the VM.
>   */
> -static void add_to_kill(struct task_struct *tsk, struct page *p,
> -                      struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> -                      struct list_head *to_kill)
> +static void add_to_kill(struct task_struct *tsk, struct page *p, pgoff_t pgoff,
> +                       struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct list_head *to_kill)
>  {
>         struct to_kill *tk;
>
> @@ -360,9 +358,15 @@ static void add_to_kill(struct task_struct *tsk, struct page *p,
>         }
>
>         tk->addr = page_address_in_vma(p, vma);
> -       if (is_zone_device_page(p))
> -               tk->size_shift = dev_pagemap_mapping_shift(p, vma);
> -       else
> +       if (is_zone_device_page(p)) {
> +               /*
> +                * Since page->mapping is not used for fsdax, we need
> +                * calculate the address based on the vma.
> +                */
> +               if (p->pgmap->type == MEMORY_DEVICE_FS_DAX)
> +                       tk->addr = vma_pgoff_address(vma, pgoff);
> +               tk->size_shift = dev_pagemap_mapping_shift(vma, tk->addr);
> +       } else
>                 tk->size_shift = page_shift(compound_head(p));
>
>         /*
> @@ -510,7 +514,7 @@ static void collect_procs_anon(struct page *page, struct list_head *to_kill,
>                         if (!page_mapped_in_vma(page, vma))
>                                 continue;
>                         if (vma->vm_mm == t->mm)
> -                               add_to_kill(t, page, vma, to_kill);
> +                               add_to_kill(t, page, 0, vma, to_kill);

Why is the @pgoff argument 0? @pgoff is available. Not that I expect
dax pages will ever be anonymous, might as well not leave that land
mine for future refactoring.

Other than that you can add:

Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux