Re: race between vfs_rename and do_linkat (mv and link)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 10:56:29AM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:

> Doing "lock_rename() + lookup last components" would fix this race.

No go - thanks to the possibility of AT_SYMLINK_FOLLOW there.
Think of it - we'd need to
	* lock parents (both at the same time)
	* look up the last component of source
	* if it turns a symlink - unlock parents and repeat the entire
thing for its body, except when asked not to.
	* when we are done with the source, look the last component of
target up

... and then there is sodding -ESTALE handling, with all the elegance
that brings in.

> If this was only done on retry, then that would prevent possible
> performance regressions, at the cost of extra complexity.

Extra compared to the above, that is.  How delightful...



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux