Miklos Szeredi: > I'd personally be more motivated to review <2000 line chunks (where > each step adds new functionality and makes sense in itself), than a > 20000 line filesystem all in one. That is reasonable. :-) > Perhaps it's easier, but copy-up is a very inefficient operation, both > in disk space and in time. My personal opinion is that a "delta" I have to agree again. > But that's just a thought, I haven't gone too deeply into this. > > > If you say "just a part of write" goes to a new fs, then I don't think > > we can support several essential features, for instance mmap. > > It should be possible to support mmap. In a easy way? I know you already wrote it is just a thought, but if you have an idea to support mmapping a file which is distributed multiple filesystems, please let me know. J. R. Okajima -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
