Re: [PATCHv1 7/9] ext4: Add ext4_sb_block_valid() refactored out of ext4_inode_block_valid()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 22/02/07 05:42PM, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Sat 05-02-22 19:39:56, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> > This API will be needed at places where we don't have an inode
> > for e.g. while freeing blocks in ext4_group_add_blocks()
> >
> > Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ...
>
> > @@ -329,7 +324,8 @@ int ext4_inode_block_valid(struct inode *inode, ext4_fsblk_t start_blk,
> >  		else if (start_blk >= (entry->start_blk + entry->count))
> >  			n = n->rb_right;
> >  		else {
> > -			ret = (entry->ino == inode->i_ino);
> > +			if (inode)
> > +				ret = (entry->ino == inode->i_ino);
> >  			break;
>
> In case inode is not passed, we must not overlap any entry in the rbtree.
> So we should return 0, not 1.
>
Damm! Thanks for catching that. Don't know how did I miss that.
Will make this below change then.
	else {
		ret = 0;
		if (inode)
			ret = (entry->ino == inode->i_ino)
		break;
	}

-riteshh

> 								Honza
> --
> Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
> SUSE Labs, CR



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux