Re: [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] are we going to use ioctls forever?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/31/22 17:33, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
It would seem we keep tacking on things with ioctls for the block
layer and filesystems. Even for new trendy things like io_uring [0].
For a few years I have found this odd, and have slowly started
asking folks why we don't consider alternatives like a generic
netlink family. I've at least been told that this is desirable
but no one has worked on it. *If* we do want this I think we just
not only need to commit to do this, but also provide a target. LSFMM
seems like a good place to do this.

Do we need a new netlink family for this purpose? The RDMA subsystem uses netlink since considerable time for configuration purposes instead of ioctls, sysfs or configfs. The user space tool 'rdma' supports that interface. That tool is used by e.g. blktests to configure the soft-RoCE and soft-iWARP interfaces.

See also rdma(8), available at e.g. https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man8/rdma.8.html.

Bart.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux