On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 15:04 -0600, Steve French wrote: > Does the Linux nfs client (or other similar clients) have a mount > option to control fsync behavior? Err??? What's the context here? I suppose that we do have '-onolock' which turns off NFSv2/v3 remote locking. Cheers Trond > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 3:03 PM > Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/cifs: send SMB_COM_FLUSH in cifs_fsync > To: Horst Reiterer <horst.reiterer@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-cifs-client@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Horst Reiterer > <horst.reiterer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > In any case, it's probably a good idea to introduce a mount option. The > > new behavior should be enabled by default though, to provide maximum data > > consistency. > > Suggestions on what to call such a new mount option? How about > "nostrictfsync" ? > > -- > Thanks, > > Steve > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
