On Wed, 2022-01-26 at 18:14 -0800, Eric Biggers wrote: > On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 02:15:20PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: > > Still, I was able to run xfstests on this set yesterday. Bug #2 above > > prevented all of the tests from passing, but it didn't oops! I call that > > progress! Given that, I figured this is a good time to post what I have > > so far. > > One question: what sort of testing are you doing to show that the file contents > and filenames being stored (i.e., sent by the client to the server in this case) > have been encrypted correctly? xfstests has tests that verify this for block > device based filesystems; are you doing any equivalent testing? > I've been testing this pretty regularly with xfstests, and the filenames portion all seems to be working correctly. Parts of the content encryption also seem to work ok. I'm still working that piece, so I haven't been able to validate that part yet. At the moment I'm working on switching the ceph client over to doing sparse reads, which is necessary in order to be able to handle sparse writes without filling in unwritten holes. -- Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
