Re: [PATCH 04/12] mm/vmscan: Free non-shmem folios without splitting them

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 12:18:14PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
> We have to allocate memory in order to split a file-backed folio, so
> it's not a good idea to split them in the memory freeing path.

Could elaborate on why split a file-backed folio requires memory
allocation?

> It also
> doesn't work for XFS because pages have an extra reference count from
> page_has_private() and split_huge_page() expects that reference to have
> already been removed.

Need to adjust can_split_huge_page()?

> Unfortunately, we still have to split shmem THPs
> because we can't handle swapping out an entire THP yet.

... especially if the system doesn't have swap :P

> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  mm/vmscan.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 700434db5735..45665874082d 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -1728,8 +1728,8 @@ static unsigned int shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list,
>  				/* Adding to swap updated mapping */
>  				mapping = page_mapping(page);
>  			}
> -		} else if (unlikely(PageTransHuge(page))) {
> -			/* Split file THP */
> +		} else if (PageSwapBacked(page) && PageTransHuge(page)) {
> +			/* Split shmem THP */
>  			if (split_huge_page_to_list(page, page_list))
>  				goto keep_locked;
>  		}
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux