Re: [dm-devel] Proper way to test RAID456?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



CC'ing linux-raid mailing list, where md raid development happens.
dm-raid is just a different interface to md raid.

On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 10:30:56 +0800
Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Recently I'm working on refactor btrfs raid56 (with long term objective
> to add proper journal to solve write-hole), and the coverage of current
> fstests for btrfs RAID56 is not that ideal.
>
> Is there any project testing dm/md RAID456 for things like
> re-silvering/write-hole problems?
>
> And how you dm guys do the tests for stacked RAID456?
>
> I really hope to learn some tricks from the existing, tried-and-true
> RAID456 implementations, and hopefully to solve the known write-hole
> bugs in btrfs.
>
> Thanks,
> Qu
>
>
> --
> dm-devel mailing list
> dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
>



--





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux