Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] signals: Support more than 64 signals

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Walt Drummond <walt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] signals: Support more than 64 signals
From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2022 01:16:17 +0000
Cc: aacraid@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, anna.schumaker@xxxxxxxxxx, arnd@xxxxxxxx, bsegall@xxxxxxxxxx, bp@xxxxxxxxx, chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx, bristot@xxxxxxxxxx, dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, dietmar.eggemann@xxxxxxx, dinguyen@xxxxxxxxxx, geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hpa@xxxxxxxxx, idryomov@xxxxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, yzaikin@xxxxxxxxxx, ink@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, jmorris@xxxxxxxxx, bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx, jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx, jirislaby@xxxxxxxxxx, john.johansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, juri.lelli@xxxxxxxxxx, keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx, mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx, martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx, mattst88@xxxxxxxxx, mgorman@xxxxxxx, oleg@xxxxxxxxxx, pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx, peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, rth@xxxxxxxxxxx, richard@xxxxxx, serge@xxxxxxxxxx, rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-alpha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-m68k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-security-module@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CADCN6nx4VWtR79TBDTENRExjsa=KAGuUpyz06iu2EGmSTPyc+Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 05:00:58PM -0800, Walt Drummond wrote:
> I simply wanted SIGINFO and VSTATUS, and that necessitated this.

Elaborate, please.  What exactly requires more than 32 rt signals?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] signals: Support more than 64 signals
  - From: Al Viro

References:
- [RFC PATCH 0/8] signals: Support more than 64 signals
  - From: Walt Drummond
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] signals: Support more than 64 signals
  - From: Al Viro
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] signals: Support more than 64 signals
  - From: Walt Drummond

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] signals: Support more than 64 signals
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] iomap: Address soft lockup in iomap_finish_ioend()
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] signals: Support more than 64 signals
Next by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] signals: Support more than 64 signals
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [NTFS 3] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [NTFS 3] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]