Re: [PATCH 00/48] Folios for 5.17

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2 Jan 2022, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 04:22:08AM +0000, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
> > This all passes xfstests with no new failures on both xfs and tmpfs.
> > I intend to put all this into for-next tomorrow.
> 
> As a result of Christoph's review, here's the diff.  I don't
> think it's worth re-posting the entire patch series.

Yes, please don't re-post.  I've just spent a few days testing and
fixing the shmem end of it (as I did in Nov 2020 - but I've kept
closer to your intent this time), three patches follow:

 mm/shmem.c    |   58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 mm/truncate.c |   15 ++++++------
 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

Those patches are against next-20211224, not based on your latest diff;
but I think your shmem.c and truncate.c updates can just be replaced by
mine (yes, I too changed "same_page" to "same_folio").

Hugh



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux