Re: [PATCH RFC v6 1/2] fs/lock: add new callback, lm_expire_lock, to lock_manager_operations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2021-12-06 at 18:39 +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote:
> 
> 
> > On Dec 6, 2021, at 12:59 PM, Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > Add new callback, lm_expire_lock, to lock_manager_operations to
> > allow
> > the lock manager to take appropriate action to resolve the lock
> > conflict
> > if possible. The callback takes 2 arguments, file_lock of the
> > blocker
> > and a testonly flag:
> > 
> > testonly = 1  check and return true if lock conflict can be
> > resolved
> >              else return false.
> > testonly = 0  resolve the conflict if possible, return true if
> > conflict
> >              was resolved esle return false.
> > 
> > Lock manager, such as NFSv4 courteous server, uses this callback to
> > resolve conflict by destroying lock owner, or the NFSv4 courtesy
> > client
> > (client that has expired but allowed to maintains its states) that
> > owns
> > the lock.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Al, Jeff, as co-maintainers of record for fs/locks.c, can you give
> an Ack or Reviewed-by? I'd like to take this patch through the nfsd
> tree for v5.17. Thanks for your time!
> 
> 
> > ---
> > fs/locks.c         | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > include/linux/fs.h |  1 +
> > 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
> > index 3d6fb4ae847b..0fef0a6322c7 100644
> > --- a/fs/locks.c
> > +++ b/fs/locks.c
> > @@ -954,6 +954,7 @@ posix_test_lock(struct file *filp, struct
> > file_lock *fl)
> >         struct file_lock *cfl;
> >         struct file_lock_context *ctx;
> >         struct inode *inode = locks_inode(filp);
> > +       bool ret;
> > 
> >         ctx = smp_load_acquire(&inode->i_flctx);
> >         if (!ctx || list_empty_careful(&ctx->flc_posix)) {
> > @@ -962,11 +963,20 @@ posix_test_lock(struct file *filp, struct
> > file_lock *fl)
> >         }
> > 
> >         spin_lock(&ctx->flc_lock);
> > +retry:
> >         list_for_each_entry(cfl, &ctx->flc_posix, fl_list) {
> > -               if (posix_locks_conflict(fl, cfl)) {
> > -                       locks_copy_conflock(fl, cfl);
> > -                       goto out;
> > +               if (!posix_locks_conflict(fl, cfl))
> > +                       continue;
> > +               if (cfl->fl_lmops && cfl->fl_lmops->lm_expire_lock
> > &&
> > +                               cfl->fl_lmops->lm_expire_lock(cfl,
> > 1)) {
> > +                       spin_unlock(&ctx->flc_lock);
> > +                       ret = cfl->fl_lmops->lm_expire_lock(cfl,
> > 0);
> > +                       spin_lock(&ctx->flc_lock);
> > +                       if (ret)
> > +                               goto retry;
> >                 }
> > +               locks_copy_conflock(fl, cfl);

How do you know 'cfl' still points to a valid object after you've
dropped the spin lock that was protecting the list?

> > +               goto out;
> >         }
> >         fl->fl_type = F_UNLCK;
> > out:
> > @@ -1140,6 +1150,7 @@ static int posix_lock_inode(struct inode
> > *inode, struct file_lock *request,
> >         int error;
> >         bool added = false;
> >         LIST_HEAD(dispose);
> > +       bool ret;
> > 
> >         ctx = locks_get_lock_context(inode, request->fl_type);
> >         if (!ctx)
> > @@ -1166,9 +1177,20 @@ static int posix_lock_inode(struct inode
> > *inode, struct file_lock *request,
> >          * blocker's list of waiters and the global blocked_hash.
> >          */
> >         if (request->fl_type != F_UNLCK) {
> > +retry:
> >                 list_for_each_entry(fl, &ctx->flc_posix, fl_list) {
> >                         if (!posix_locks_conflict(request, fl))
> >                                 continue;
> > +                       if (fl->fl_lmops && fl->fl_lmops-
> > >lm_expire_lock &&
> > +                                       fl->fl_lmops-
> > >lm_expire_lock(fl, 1)) {
> > +                               spin_unlock(&ctx->flc_lock);
> > +                               percpu_up_read(&file_rwsem);
> > +                               ret = fl->fl_lmops-
> > >lm_expire_lock(fl, 0);
> > +                               percpu_down_read(&file_rwsem);
> > +                               spin_lock(&ctx->flc_lock);
> > +                               if (ret)
> > +                                       goto retry;
> > +                       }

ditto.

> >                         if (conflock)
> >                                 locks_copy_conflock(conflock, fl);
> >                         error = -EAGAIN;
> > diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> > index e7a633353fd2..1a76b6451398 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> > @@ -1071,6 +1071,7 @@ struct lock_manager_operations {
> >         int (*lm_change)(struct file_lock *, int, struct list_head
> > *);
> >         void (*lm_setup)(struct file_lock *, void **);
> >         bool (*lm_breaker_owns_lease)(struct file_lock *);
> > +       bool (*lm_expire_lock)(struct file_lock *fl, bool
> > testonly);
> > };
> > 
> > struct lock_manager {
> > -- 
> > 2.9.5
> > 
> 
> --
> Chuck Lever
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer, Hammerspace
trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux