Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] tools/testing/selftests/bpf: replace open-coded 16 with TASK_COMM_LEN

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] tools/testing/selftests/bpf: replace open-coded 16 with TASK_COMM_LEN
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 11:08:58 -0500
Cc: Sven Schnelle <svens@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, bpf <bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-perf-use." <linux-perf-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Linux MM <linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, kernel test robot <oliver.sang@xxxxxxxxx>, kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@xxxxxxxxx>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@xxxxxxxxx>, Michal Miroslaw <mirq-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20211129110755.616133df@gandalf.local.home>

On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 11:07:55 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I wonder if BTF could take advantage of the tracing:
> 
> TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM() macros?

Bah' BTF does handle enums, it doesn't handle macros. But I wonder if we
could do something similar for BTF. That is, force it.

-- Steve

References:
- [PATCH v2 0/7] task comm cleanups
  - From: Yafang Shao
- [PATCH v2 7/7] tools/testing/selftests/bpf: replace open-coded 16 with TASK_COMM_LEN
  - From: Yafang Shao
- Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] tools/testing/selftests/bpf: replace open-coded 16 with TASK_COMM_LEN
  - From: Sven Schnelle
- Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] tools/testing/selftests/bpf: replace open-coded 16 with TASK_COMM_LEN
  - From: Yafang Shao
- Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] tools/testing/selftests/bpf: replace open-coded 16 with TASK_COMM_LEN
  - From: Sven Schnelle
- Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] tools/testing/selftests/bpf: replace open-coded 16 with TASK_COMM_LEN
  - From: David Hildenbrand
- Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] tools/testing/selftests/bpf: replace open-coded 16 with TASK_COMM_LEN
  - From: Sven Schnelle
- Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] tools/testing/selftests/bpf: replace open-coded 16 with TASK_COMM_LEN
  - From: Yafang Shao
- Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] tools/testing/selftests/bpf: replace open-coded 16 with TASK_COMM_LEN
  - From: Steven Rostedt

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] fs/binfmt_elf: replace open-coded string copy with get_task_comm
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH RFC v5 0/2] nfsd: Initial implementation of NFSv4 Courteous Server
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] tools/testing/selftests/bpf: replace open-coded 16 with TASK_COMM_LEN
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] tools/testing/selftests/bpf: replace open-coded 16 with TASK_COMM_LEN
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [NTFS 3] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [NTFS 3] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]