On Sun, 25 Jan 2009, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Szabolcs Szakacsits wrote:
> > * Significant performance improvements.
>
> I've read that NTFS-3g performs well, which is really good news.
These are the latest compilebench results (zfs-fuse needs a public patch,
or turning on FUSE attribute caching and big write support):
Runtime (s) MB/s
----------- -----
btrfs, no dup 168 51.42
btrfs 197 42.67
ext4 245 35.63
ntfs-3g opti 370 21.41
zfs-fuse opti 459 16.40
ext3 559 19.92
xfs nobarrier 562 14.17
reiserfs 595 13.11
zfs-fuse 614 12.47
ntfs-3g 2022 4.03
nilfs2 3719 12.06
xfs 3786 1.95
> > * High-performance NTFS-3G driver for embedded devices.
> > http://ntfs-3g.org/commercial.html
>
> That page say the commercial version has "10-20 times better performance".
>
> Does it mean the GPL version is 10-20 times slower than it would be
> with some performance optimisations,
More like 3-20 times. It really depends on the workload and plenty of other
things.
> and do you have plans for those optimisations make their way into the GPL
> version eventually?
Sure, everything is being released under the GPL either at the same time
or a bit later.
Szaka
--
NTFS-3G: http://ntfs-3g.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
