Re: Any bio_clone_slow() implementation which doesn't share bi_io_vec?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 04:10:35PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Without bio_chain() sounds pretty good, as we can still utilize
> bi_end_io and bi_private.
> 
> But this also means, we're now responsible not to release the source bio
> since it has the real bi_io_vec.

Just call bio_inc_remaining before submitting the cloned bio, and then
call bio_endio on the root bio every time a clone completes.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux