Re: [rfc] fsync_range?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Florian Weimer:

> * Theodore Tso:
>
>> Actually, I take that back; Oracle (and most other enterprise
>> databases; the world is not just Oracle --- there's also DB2, for
>> example) generally uses Direct I/O, so I wonder if they are using
>> sync_file_range() at all.
>
> Recent PostgreSQL might use it because it has got a single-threaded
> background writer which benefits from non-blocking fsync().  I'll have
> to check to be sure, though.

Uhm, it doesn't.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux