Re: NFS/credentials leak in 2.6.29-rc1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 06:18:11PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields (bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> > Port fields are fun
> > 
> > > > 15:34:41.253911 IP addr1.1835336279 > addr2.2049: 44 null
> >                              ^^^^^^^^^^   vs    ^^^^
> > 
> > It is likely copied skb corruption, ports change, but acks correspond
> > sometimes.
> 
> Obviously it's normal that the client- and server- side ports would
> differ, so I assume you meant to point out the variation in the client
> port number?  (1835336279, 728, 1852113495, 1868890711, 1885667927).

I meant that ack still comes to the fun port, not only to correct one.
And some ports are obviously incorrect like 4 above.

-- 
	Evgeniy Polyakov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux