Re: [RFC] [PATCH] vfs: Call filesystem callback when backing device caches should be flushed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jan Kara wrote:
> On Tue 20-01-09 15:16:48, Joel Becker wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 05:05:27PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > >   we noted in our testing that ext2 (and it seems some other filesystems as
> > > well) don't flush disk's write caches on cases like fsync() or changing
> > > DIRSYNC directory. This is my attempt to solve the problem in a generic way
> > > by calling a filesystem callback from VFS at appropriate place as Andrew
> > > suggested. For ext2 what I did is enough (it just then fills in
> > > block_flush_device() as .flush_device callback) and I think it could be
> > > fine for other filesystems as well.
> > 
> > 	The only question I have is why this would be optional.  It
> > would seem that this would be the preferred default behavior for all
> > block filesystems.  We have the backing_dev_info and a way to override
> > the default if a filesystem needs something special.
>
>   The reason why I've decided for NOP to be the default is that
> filesystems doing proper journalling with barriers should not need
> this (as the barrier in the transaction commit already does the job
> for them).

No, that doesn't work.

fsync() doesn't always cause a transaction.  If there's no inode
change, there may not be a transaction.  Writing does not always dirty
mtime, if it's within mtime granularity.

For efficient fdatasync() you _never_ want a transaction if possible,
because it forces the disk head to seek between alternating regions of
the disk, two seeks per fsync().

So you can't rely on journalling transactions to flush.

>   Finally, I prefer maintainers of the filesystems themselves to decide
> whether their filesystem needs flushing and thus knowingly impose this
> performance penalty on them...

I say it should flush be default unless a filesystem hooks an
alternative strategy.  Certainly, it's silly to have the same code
duplicated in nearly every filesystem

-- Jamie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux