On 10/22/21 16:46, Mel Gorman wrote:
> The page allocator stalls based on the number of pages that are
> waiting for writeback to start but this should now be redundant.
> shrink_inactive_list() will wake flusher threads if the LRU tail are
> unqueued dirty pages so the flusher should be active. If it fails to make
> progress due to pages under writeback not being completed quickly then
> it should stall on VMSCAN_THROTTLE_WRITEBACK.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/page_alloc.c | 21 +--------------------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 78e538067651..8fa0109ff417 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -4795,30 +4795,11 @@ should_reclaim_retry(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned order,
> trace_reclaim_retry_zone(z, order, reclaimable,
> available, min_wmark, *no_progress_loops, wmark);
> if (wmark) {
> - /*
> - * If we didn't make any progress and have a lot of
> - * dirty + writeback pages then we should wait for
> - * an IO to complete to slow down the reclaim and
> - * prevent from pre mature OOM
> - */
> - if (!did_some_progress) {
> - unsigned long write_pending;
> -
> - write_pending = zone_page_state_snapshot(zone,
> - NR_ZONE_WRITE_PENDING);
> -
> - if (2 * write_pending > reclaimable) {
> - congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/10);
> - return true;
> - }
> - }
> -
> ret = true;
> - goto out;
> + break;
> }
> }
>
> -out:
> /*
> * Memory allocation/reclaim might be called from a WQ context and the
> * current implementation of the WQ concurrency control doesn't
>
