On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 06:55:13PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 11:13:28AM +0200, Len Baker wrote: > > I think it's better for code to be understandable. Your patch makes > the code less readable in the name of "security", which is a poor > justification. I agree with Matthew. Those functions seem to be a bit too much, for now. Let's keep it simple and start by replacing the open-coded instances when possible, first. Then we can dig much deeper depending on each particular case, taking into consideration readability, which is certainly important. Thanks -- Gustavo
