On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 4:42 AM Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> But probing the entire memory range in fault domain granularity in the
> page fault-in functions still doesn't actually make sense. Those
> functions really only need to guarantee that we'll be able to make
> progress eventually. From that point of view, it should be enough to
> probe the first byte of the requested memory range
That's probably fine.
Although it should be more than one byte - "copy_from_user()" might do
word-at-a-time optimizations, so you could have an infinite loop of
(a) copy_from_user() fails because the chunk it tried to get failed partly
(b) fault_in() probing succeeds, because the beginning part is fine
so I agree that the fault-in code doesn't need to do the whole area,
but it needs to at least do some <N bytes, up to length> thing, to
handle the situation where the copy_to/from_user requires more than a
single byte.
Linus
