On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 04:38:49PM -0700, Yang Shi wrote: > > However, it still doesn't make too much sense to have thp_size passed > > to do_invalidatepage(), then have PAGE_SIZE hardcoded in a BUG > > assertion IMHO. So it seems this patch is still useful because > > block_invalidatepage() is called by a few filesystems as well, for > > example, ext4. Or I'm wondering whether we should call > > do_invalidatepage() for each subpage of THP in truncate_cleanup_page() > > since private is for each subpage IIUC. > > Seems no interest? No. I have changes in this area as part of the folio patchset (where we end up converting this to invalidate_folio). I'm not really interested in doing anything before that, since this shouldn't be reachable today. > Anyway the more I was staring at the code the more I thought calling > do_invalidatepage() for each subpage made more sense. So, something > like the below makes sense? Definitely not. We want to invalidate the entire folio at once.