On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 05:00:28PM +0200, Uladzislau Rezki wrote: > > > > On Wed 20-10-21 16:29:14, Uladzislau Rezki wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 4:06 PM Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > [...] > > > > As I've said I am OK with either of the two. Do you or anybody have any > > > > preference? Without any explicit event to wake up for neither of the two > > > > is more than just an optimistic retry. > > > > > > > From power perspective it is better to have a delay, so i tend to say > > > that delay is better. > > > > I am a terrible random number generator. Can you give me a number > > please? > > > Well, we can start from one jiffy so it is one timer tick: schedule_timeout(1) > A small nit, it is better to replace it by the simple msleep() call: msleep(jiffies_to_msecs(1)); -- Vlad Rezki
